[blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat (was Equity)

[Brian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:46 +0100 (BST)
"Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk> wrote:

<snip> 

> 
> Even if properly disclosed there is a possibility that the TD will
> find evidence that the bid is, in fact, systemic.  Should that occur
> and the systemic meaning be a banned HUM the penalties and redress
> will be the same as those stipulated for using a HUM in a non-HUM
> event. 

Which, given the likely draconian penalties for using a HUM in a
non-HUM event, brings us back to my contention that players are
*entitled* to some form of *quantitative* means to assess whether or
not their psyche is going to be deemed systemic. To leave this to an
individual TD, or even a group of TDs, is farcical. 


Brian. 

- -- 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGoJt1X39R2QaHMdMRAoQJAJ9QLolCGLz1Xb8g5iBG5IwH+4w92wCeLGHk
fzDMnpJxMRkiX/dqZhq5SdA=
=I/pD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----