[blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Wayne Burrows
wjburrows at gmail.com
Mon Jul 23 12:23:42 CEST 2007
On 23/07/07, richard.hills at immi.gov.au <richard.hills at immi.gov.au> wrote:
> Herman De Wael:
>
> >Yes Sven, but that creates partnership experience, which must be
> >disclosed, not partnership understanding, which can be regulated
> >as system!
> >
> >As Wayne has said, there is a difference between the two!
>
> Richard Hills:
>
> As the WBF Code of Practice has said, there is not a difference
> between the two.
>
> Perhaps Herman is spending too much time interpreting the highly
> ambiguous Laws 40 and 75, since it is easy to choose to interpret
> those ambiguities in a way consistent with Herman's pre-existing
> worldview?
>
> Isaac Asimov (1920-1992):
>
> "You can prove anything you want by coldly logical reason - if
> you pick the proper postulates."
>
> Richard Hills:
>
> Perhaps Herman is not spending enough time reading the less
> ambiguous WBF Code of Practice, because it is an Inconvenient
> Truth which refutes this aspect of the De Wael School?
>
Where in the WBF Code of Practice does it address the issue between
partnership experience and partnership understanding?
Wayne
More information about the blml
mailing list