[blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Jerry Fusselman jfusselman at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 00:48:12 CEST 2007


On 7/24/07, Wayne Burrows <wjburrows at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wow!!!  You are reading something in L40D that I cannot see.  There is
> nothing there that suggests 'understanding' encompasses 'experience'.
> In so much as 'understanding' is synonymous with 'agreement' I can see
> how that is included.

<snip>

> And similarly in L75C there is nothing stating that 'partnership
> agreement and partnership experience' make up the whole 'partnership
> understanding'.

Well, no doubt it will be far clearer very soon---in the next laws.

In brief, L75C says that the stuff you need to disclose includes
partnership agreements and partnership experience.  L40D calls all
that stuff by one word, understanding.  Unfortunately, as you point
out, the laws blur that one-word summary, sometimes calling it
agreement.  I bet this won't happen in the next laws.

-Jerry Fusselman



More information about the blml mailing list