[blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Wayne Burrows]

On 25/07/07, Sven Pran <svenpran at online.no> wrote:
> > On Behalf Of Wayne Burrows
> > > ..............
> > I wouldn't dream that 'understanding' encompasses both 'agreement' and
> > 'experience' from anything written in the laws.
>
> If you with this are stating that you have "agreements" and "experience" on
> which you base your calls at the bridge table in spite of not
> "understanding" these "agreements" and "experiences" I absolutely understand
> your position, but I really hope (for your sake) that you understand what
> you and your partner are doing at the bridge table?
>

Sven you are mixing to different things ...

I understand is a verb

An understanding is a noun

It is the noun understanding that is used in the Law 40 not the verb understand.

Wayne