[blml] Disclosure
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Sun Jul 29 10:58:20 CEST 2007
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet .co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The trouble with referees is that they
know the rules , but they don't know
the game." [Bill Shankly]
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Willner" <willner at cfa.harvard.edu>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Disclosure
> (sorry, meant to include this in my previous message)
>
> From: Eric Landau <ehaa at starpower.net>
>> I may have a "heightened
>> awareness" that partner is psyching his call because I know that (a)
>> he has psyched this particular call in the past, but only when he has
>> been having a very bad game (clearly disclosable) *and* (b) I
>> estimate that we are having a very bad game. I do not believe that
>> that the latter is a disclosable "understanding",
>
> Steve Willner:
> Your knowledge comes from partnership experience, and I don't
> see why it isn't disclosable.
<
+=+ Concerning (b) I do not think one should disclose one's
own belief that 'we are having a bad game'. It is more a case
of "should partner think we are having a bad game".
The underlying question is whether opponent has the
same information as yourself to judge what that individual
seated opposite you is doing. The test, I think, is whether
you have information (other than information generally known
to bridge players) that you have not disclosed and it turns out
to be crucial for opponent's judgement of his (opponent's)
action.
~ Grattan ~ +=+
More information about the blml
mailing list