[blml] Réf. : Re: Nondisclosure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
> Any partnership who belongs in a New Zealand National Trials should
> have generic defences to ambiguous overcalls prepared well before
> the event started.
 
AG : any partnership, at any time, any level and in any competition, should
be given time for recalling their generic defenses. Come to think of it,
that's why New Zealand (like Belgium) requires advance disclosure. 
To put it squarely, if you require advance disclosure, but allow intricated
conventions without this disclosure, that's pretty incoherent, isn't it ?
 
Ah yes, one more point : do you really think the defense should be the same
if 1S meant "majors or diamonds", "majors or minors" (CRaSh) or "spades or
reds" ?  
I do not.
Whence generic defenses aren't enough (especially at such a high level).
 
Regards
 
   Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070601/bd62080c/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070601/bd62080c/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070601/bd62080c/attachment-0001.gif