[blml] DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Robert Geller
geller at nifty.com
Mon Jun 4 17:16:57 CEST 2007
The answer seems very simple. He should give the correct answer
according to the system, but this answer is UI to his partner. If his partner
uses the info then there can/should be a score adjustment. What's
the problem?
-Bob
Herman De Wael さんは書きました:
>ton wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to repeat this interesting question? I must have missed it
>> and might have an opinion.
>>
>> ton
>>
>
>The question is the standard one from the discussion termed
>"DeWaelSchool" on this list for the past 10 years:
>
>A player hears his partner misexplain his previous bid and is now
>asked to explain partner's next one; he has two options:
>- either he gives a correct systemic answer, thereby revealing that
>partner has misunderstood and creating UI for partner;
>- or he tells the opponents what his partner intended, thereby not
>revealing that partner misunderstood, but giving additional MI.
>
>Which of the two should he do?
>
>
>--
>Herman DE WAEL
>Antwerpen Belgium
>http://www.hdw.be
>
>_______________________________________________
>blml mailing list
>blml at amsterdamned.org
>http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller, Tokyo, Japan geller at nifty.com
More information about the blml
mailing list