[blml] R馭. : Re: DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Robert Geller]

Sorry if I think Herman's point is not well-taken.
Law 20 apllies (you have to explain your agreements), and 
Law73C also applies (partner has to avoid using the UI from
your correct explanation of the system).  

-Bob





Alain Gottcheiner さんは書きました:
> 
>
> 
>
>-------Message original-------
>
> 
>
>De : Robert Geller
>
>Date : 06/04/07 17:51:26
>
>A : Herman De Wael
>
>Cc : blml
>
>Sujet : Re: [blml] DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
>
> 
>
>Herman, it seems to me you are arguing about what the laws and
>
>regulations should be, rather than what they actually are now.
>
>You may or may not be right if you are arguing about what the laws
>
>should be (although I personally don't agree), but I think you are
>
>incorrect in arguing that the present laws can be interpreted in
>
>the sense you advocate.
>
> 
>
>Robert, ISTM you're mistaken. 
>
>Herman (together with YT) is arguing that, whenever partner gave wrong
>explanation, you're caught in the middle between obligations to L20 (you
>have to explain your system, not partner's holding) and L 73 (you should
>strive to avoid transmitting information to your partner by any others means
>than bids and cards ; this includes information that partner is wrong about
>the system or that you made the wrong bid). 
>
>And we both think it will often be be the lesser of two evils to choose
>going along with L 73 rather than with L 20.
>
> 
>
>Best regards
>
> 
>
>   Alain

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com