[blml] Réf. : Re: DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : Robert Geller
Date : 06/04/07 17:51:26
A : Herman De Wael
Cc : blml
Sujet : Re: [blml] DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 
Herman, it seems to me you are arguing about what the laws and
regulations should be, rather than what they actually are now.
You may or may not be right if you are arguing about what the laws
should be (although I personally don't agree), but I think you are
incorrect in arguing that the present laws can be interpreted in
the sense you advocate.
 
Robert, ISTM you're mistaken. 
Herman (together with YT) is arguing that, whenever partner gave wrong
explanation, you're caught in the middle between obligations to L20 (you
have to explain your system, not partner's holding) and L 73 (you should
strive to avoid transmitting information to your partner by any others means
than bids and cards ; this includes information that partner is wrong about
the system or that you made the wrong bid). 
And we both think it will often be be the lesser of two evils to choose
going along with L 73 rather than with L 20.
 
Best regards
 
   Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070604/c2d3163d/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070604/c2d3163d/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 16816 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070604/c2d3163d/attachment-0001.gif