[blml] DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Jerry Fusselman]

On 6/4/07, ton <t.kooyman at worldonline.nl> wrote:
>  I should have known, this is not interesting at all and Herman is wrong
> saying that the LC has not answered this question.
> We did not give his answer and that for sure is unforgivable.
>
> Of course the only obligation a player has is to explain the partnership
> agreements.
>
>
> ton
>

ton, are you willing to cite or state the answer explicitly?

So far, I find Herman's arguments on this issue quite convincing,
while the counterarguments I have been reading seem to me generally or
always to miss Herman's points.  So many dismissive comments and so
little content.  The only writers who are being specific and clear on
this topic seems to be Herman and a few who agree with him on this
issue.  Herman's writing shows a tenfold better grasp of the
counterarguments than the counter arguers' writing shows of his
position.  He addresses the counterarguments with great patience and
clarity; the other side refuses to even attempt to answer several of
his clear questions or address his best points.

Anyway, if it has really been addressed by the LC, let's see what was
written, okay?

-Jerry Fusselman