[blml] R馭. : Re: DeWael School and WBFLC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Robert Geller
geller at nifty.com
Tue Jun 5 09:44:07 CEST 2007
Give me a break!!!
L73B1 reads as follows
**********************************************
B. Inappropriate Communication Between Partners
1. Gratuitous Information
Partners shall not communicate through the manner in which calls or plays are made, through extraneous
remarks or gestures, through questions asked or not asked of the opponents or through alerts and
explanations given or not given to them.
******************************************
This says you can't use an answer to a question to deliberately communicate info
to partner. It doesn't in any way say you are relieved of the obligation to answer
questions about your agreements like a pre-programmed robot, which is what the
laws require.
-Bob
Alain Gottcheiner さんは書きました:
>At 02:27 5/06/2007 +0900, Robert Geller wrote:
>>Sorry if I think Herman's point is not well-taken.
>>Law 20 apllies (you have to explain your agreements), and
>>Law73C also applies (partner has to avoid using the UI from
>>your correct explanation of the system).
>
>The problem is, L73B1 applies also.
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller, Tokyo, Japan geller at nifty.com
More information about the blml
mailing list