[blml] DeWael School and WBFLC

[Herman De Wael]

John Probst wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Herman De Wael" <hermandw at skynet.be>
> To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [blml] DeWael School and WBFLC
> 
> 
>> John Probst wrote:
>>> I think it's demeaning to Herman and any poster who just tries to howl 
>>> him
>>> down. It ain't as clear as that.
>>>
>>> Herman!  I'm hereby claiming a deWael School merit point for supporting 
>>> you
>>> while simultaneeously telling you you're a bluthering idiot!
>>>
>>>   cheers !     rgds  john
>>>
>> Thanks John. Your support means a lot to me.
>> PS: Am I wrong when I thought the word was blithering?
> 
> yep, I'm using dialect here; probably Scottish. As you know, I reject the 
> deWael school, but am certain that the only resolution is parsing the 
> minutiae of the wording of the relevant Laws and that is non-trivial. 
> Equally i know you support the deWael school from the pov of Devil's 
> Advocate as much as anything, and you certainly don't find the traditional 
> interpretation to be any more illegal than your own.  John

Yes and No. At current, a player following the advice of the Majority 
School (MS anyone?) would not be subject to any more rulings than the 
UI ruling that he subjects himself to.

However, I would urge people to think twice before changing the laws, 
or the regulations, in such a manner that the MS would become the only 
legal alternative. I've given five reasons for that, and I won't 
repeat them here.
-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://www.hdw.be