[blml] She sells sea shalls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Herman De Wael]

richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:
> 
> Richard Hills:
> 
> Herman! I am also claiming a De Wael School merit point for stating
> that Ed and John have proposed an irrelevant blwddur-ing argument.
> 
> As the Preface / Scope explains, it is an infraction to violate any
> "may not" and/or "shall" and/or "should" Laws.  Rather, the varying
> strengths of the injunctions merely reflect the varying likelihoods of
> whether procedural penalties are merited.  So, just as one cannot be a
> little bit pregnant, therefore one cannot argue that the Majority
> School is a little bit illegal, compared to the De Wael School being
> much more illegal.
> 
> :-)
> 

OK Richard, but this is not directed at me. I'm not the one that is 
saying that the dWS is more illegal than the MS. I'm the one that is 
saying that both are illegal - and therefore both are acceptable.

You are apparently agreeing with me that the actions of the MS are 
illegal, are you not?

Then you have earned a merit point for crossing the second hurdle.

You are also agreeing with me that it is virtually impossible to 
deduce from the laws which illegality is greater? Then you have earned 
another merit point fro crossing the third hurdle.

And that is all that I ask!

The actions of a player following the advice of the dWS are not legal, 
but there are no actions available to a player in these sets of 
circumstances that are completely legal.
Therefore, the actions of such players are "acceptable".


-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://www.hdw.be