[blml] ARéf. : opening lead vs 3N
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at pop.ulb.ac.be
Thu Jun 7 11:48:49 CEST 2007
-------Message original-------
De : Laszlo Hegedus
Date : 07/06/2007 01:10:00
A : Bridge Laws Mailing List
Sujet : [blml] opening lead vs 3N
You are sitting North in IMP pairs and you hold:
QT63
JT7
JT97
73
W/EW
The bidding is the following:
W E
1N 2D
3D 3N
P
1N: 12-16, denies 4card major if 16.
2D: Relay. Exactly invitational promises one or two 4 or 5 card Major
3D: good hand, no 4cM
3N: T/P
which card do you lead?
AG : a small spade 6 or 3, according to my agreements.
which card do you consider leading?
AG : Diamond Jack. This is the lead I'd make at matchpoints, since I don't
expect the cards to be placed in such a way that the contract will often go
down and because spades might be dummy's suit after all.
A heart suffers of the same disadvantage and doesn't have the same potential
advantage as a spade, so it's inferior.
Best regards
Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the blml
mailing list