[blml] ARéf. : opening lead vs 3N

Alain Gottcheiner agot at pop.ulb.ac.be
Thu Jun 7 11:48:49 CEST 2007


 
 
-------Message original-------
 
De : Laszlo Hegedus
Date : 07/06/2007 01:10:00
A : Bridge Laws Mailing List
Sujet : [blml] opening lead vs 3N
 
You are sitting North in IMP pairs and you hold:
 
QT63
JT7
JT97
73
 
W/EW
 
The bidding is the following:
 
W    E
1N  2D
3D  3N
P
 
1N: 12-16, denies 4card major if 16.
2D: Relay. Exactly invitational promises one or two 4 or 5 card Major
3D: good hand, no 4cM
3N: T/P
 
which card do you lead?
 
 
AG : a small spade 6 or 3, according to my agreements.
 
which card do you consider leading?
 
AG : Diamond Jack. This is the lead I'd make at matchpoints, since I don't
expect the cards to be placed in such a way that the contract will often go
down and because spades might be dummy's suit after all.
 
A heart suffers of the same disadvantage and doesn't have the same potential
advantage as a spade, so it's inferior.
 
Best regards
 
   Alain
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070607/82909666/attachment-0001.gif 


More information about the blml mailing list