[blml] Réf. : Re: L12C3, equity, consistency and the field.

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : Nigel
 
In summary: it is unfortunate but inevitable that the application of a
rule may effect the whole field who play a game; but the introduction of
an overly subjective rule into the game of Bridge, that will sometimes
affect the field, in accord with the God-like whim of a director -- in a
way that is virtually undetectable, unprovable, and unappeallable --
seems unfair and unnecessary.
 
 
AG : And ... ? When you have to decide between all or nothing, do you avoid
subjectivity ? Will other TDs decide the same ? Do you avoid affecting the
field by changing one result from -2 to made or the other way round ? 
 
Say you're uncertain about whether the right defense would have been found,
that some persons you questioned found it, while others of the same level
didn't. Please explain why giving down two, instead of a weighted score,
will avoid inequity.
 
Best regards
 
   Alain
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070612/5b7cff45/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070612/5b7cff45/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070612/5b7cff45/attachment-0001.gif