[blml] She sells sea shalls [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Matthias Berghaus]

Herman De Wael schrieb:
> Matthias Berghaus wrote:
>   
>> Herman, has it ever dawned on you that doing something to follow a 
>> specific law may be _without design_ on the part of the player? If a 
>> certain law tells me to do this and that, and furthermore the WBFLC tell 
>> me that giving UI in that case is no infraction, what more do you need? 
>> Two members of the WBFLC have said on this list that this is so. If you 
>> need a voice out of burning bush I cannot help you.
>>
>>     
>
> Now you are clutching at very tiny straws. you take a sentence which 
> reinterprets a law in a way that we know how it works, and interpret 
> that same sentence to say some other part of the laws mean some other 
> thing altogether. And then you say I should rest my case because the 
> WBF have issued a proclamation?
>
> The sentence in the CoP says nothing about L75D2. The MS actions break 
> L75D2. My points remain.
>
>   
And so any discussion must necessarily come to an end. We will not come 
any nearer, there is no sense whatsoever to continue.