[blml] Réf. : Re: Sergeant Pepper [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : raija
Date : 14/06/2007 09:34:20
A : blml at rtflb.org
Sujet : Re: [blml] Sergeant Pepper [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 
Still, I am a bit confused:  In the original posting you said 2C was
"Alerted and explained as 8-11 etc." .  Was this played with screens? Were
West and North screenmates? Was it West who alerted to North? If so, then
West has no UI as he does not know whether East did or did not alert 2C to
South, and subsequently, is free to make whatever call he wants to.
 
 
AG : methinks Richard wanted to know what would have happened without the
misinformation, by presenting us the deal as it should have been.
 
As for the ruling, I would make a L12C2 distinguo :
 
- the OS scores -1400, the most unfavorable result that could have happened 
 as John told us, there is no problem at all with that one ; 
- but I don't consider North's pass over 2C probable, having been given the
right explanation, hence :
- the NOS would score +400 IMHO, the most favorable probable result, for
bidding 5C directly over 2C (why not ?) and making that contract on a Heart
lead.
 
Best regards
 
    Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070614/7e299401/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070614/7e299401/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070614/7e299401/attachment-0001.gif