[blml] Réf. : Re: adjudication

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
> There should be an understanding by all players
and officials that players should not and cannot be held rigidly
to the face value 4321 count without allowing for reasonable
(and maybe slightly questionable) adjustments.  Of course this
information ought to be disclosed.  (My regular partner and I
have a disclaimer to that effect on our conevntion card.)
 
Me too. That's what the "general style" box is for.
I'd welcome an "official" checkbox on CCs : "point ranges absolute /
adaptable / loose".
 
This case is among the most obvious ; anybody who plays club tournaments
should know 3d-seat preempts are adaptable. And anyway I bet that if opener
s hand had contained a seventh heart and a little less in high-card strength
 the contract would have been made, too.
 
However, some cases are less classical ; pairs that use lightish takeout
doubles or 2/1, for example, should be careful to mention it in plain sight.
 
Best regards
 
  Alain
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070622/ef94e880/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070622/ef94e880/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 35396 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070622/ef94e880/attachment-0001.gif