[blml] adjudication

[richard willey]

<Long posting about High Card Points deleted>

Comment 1:

The entire discussion about High Card Points strikes me as extraneous.
 I'd be willing to bet dollars to donuts that primary issue that needs
to be addressed is disclosure requirements for 4th seat preempts.

Comment 2:

Assume the following:

1. Pair 1 uses hand evaluation metric 1 in evaluating hands
2. Pair 2 uses hand evaluation metric 2 in evaluating hands
3. There are significant differences between hand evaluation 1 and
hand evaluation 2
4. Pair 2 doesn't understand metric 1

There is no good way to handle this problem.

If you require that pair 2 describes their agreements using metric 1,
then Pair 2 will be provided with accurate / useless information

If you require that pair 1 describes their agreements using metric 2,
then pair 2 will be provided with inaccurate information that they
(hopefully) understand.  In particular, the boundary conditions are
likely to be a real bitch.

Neither of these two cases is very satisfactory



-- 
The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity