[blml] Réf. : Re: adjudication
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Wed Jun 27 15:09:01 CEST 2007
-------Message original-------
When we walrus declare 12-14 HCP (say) we mean 12-14 HCP. Others
declare 12-14 HCP and mean 10-16 HCP.
Apparently, I'm unique in BLML in advocating that the law should
insist that pairs declare HCP accurately and adjustments separately.
AG : you're (more or less) unique in not realizing that 10-16 isn't "an
accurate description" when 10 HCP and 16 HCP openings will come once in a
blue moon, and that "12-14, with the following adjustments ..." is more
useful to the opponents than "10-16, which includes the following
adjustments ...". Or perhaps you forgot that the aim of explanations isn't
numerology, but helpfulness.
Regards
Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070627/2337e3e7/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070627/2337e3e7/attachment-0001.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070627/2337e3e7/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the blml
mailing list