[blml] De Wael School (was ...poll) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Herman De Wael (27th February 2007):

>>>>Your interpretation is just wrong.


Richard Hills (1st March 2007):

>>>I accept the implied dare.  If Herman submits the De Wael
>>>School interpretation of Law 75D2 to the Belgian National
>>>Authority for a temporary ruling on its validity in
>>>Belgium, then I will submit the De Hills School
>>>interpretation of Law 75D2 to the Australian National
>>>Authority for a temporary ruling on its validity in
>>>Australia.

Richard Willey (22nd May 2005):

>>Herman, I was curious whether you would be willing to
>>submit a query to the Belgian Bridge authorities regarding
>>your methods?  Ultimately their opinion carries a lot more
>>weight than anyone participating in this debate.  I
>>certainly would be extremely interested in seeing a ruling
>>on this...

Herman De Wael (22nd May 2005):

>Well, actually, I don't.
>
>The BBF is not composed of a different set of directors
>than blml.
>
>Among them too, some are of the erroneaous opinions of Sven
>and yourself.
>
>If I can't vote on myself, I'd rather not ask the question.
>
>Yes, I know that this is silly.

Richard Hills (2nd March 2007):

:-(   :-(   :-(

*     *     *

>From the ancient "chrestomathy" thread ->

Richard Hills wrote:

>>>>I am currently editing a book ->
>>>>
>>>>"I Am The Very Model Of A Modern Bridge Competitor: a
>>>>chrestomathy compiled from the bridge laws mailing list"

Grattan Endicott wrote:

>>>:-) For learners presumably. Very few of those around on
>>>blml.                      ~ G ~  (-:

David Stevenson wrote:

>>I am always willing to learn.  Are you suggesting I am in
>>a minority?

Herman De Wael wrote:

>Very few of us are apparently willing to change our first
>opinions about law issues.
>
>I am not even saying I am among those few.
>
>I do think we both have a stubborn streak that is not very
>compatible with the statement "willing to learn".

Grattan Endicott wrote:

+=+ Who could have foreseen such responses?
The self-deprecation of each is admirable, in its way. :-)
As to why I commented as I did?  Maybe whimsy, maybe an
urge to see who would say what... same thing, really.
                                                 ~ G ~  +=+


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch, DIAC
02 6225 6285

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm