[blml] Hawaii Appeal 4

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 02:08 2/03/2007 +0100, Konrad Ciborowski wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
>
> > Ok, we'll agree to differ on that aspect - but do you think it
> > sufficiently clearly a losing proposition to not rate as an LA (the UI
> > suggests 4H over 3D I believe).
>
>To me 3D is not an LA. I consider it a 0% bid, bad, bad bridge.
>Of course I may very well be wrong with my assessment.

To me 3D is automatic ; it means "my hand is OK for clubs, but poor 
otherwise", a kind of "last train". Of course, I might well be wrong with 
that evaluation.

Best regards

    Alain