[blml] L9A vs L73B1 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Konrad Ciborowski]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Fusselman" <jfusselman at gmail.com>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] L9A vs L73B1 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> WBF Laws Committee minutes 1st September 1998:
>
> "It is held illegal to ask a question in order that partner may be
> aware of the information in the reply."
>
> The answer to the original question seems simple to me.  Don't ask a
> question to make partner aware.  Instead, call the director because
> there has been an irregularity:

LOL!
It amounts to the same thing. Your LHO opens 1C, not alerted.
Partner suddenly calls the TD.

- What?
- 1C should have been alerted.
- Oh, yes, sorry, I forgot.
- So what is it?
- 1C shows 2+C.
- OK, thank you.

Now partner bids 1S.

A dead man would wake up and realize that partner's 1S
bid is artificial.

The fact that ACBL made this their official rule is beyond
me but if they want make it legal to transmit and use
UI after opponents' infraction then hey, - not my monkeys,
not my circus.


Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oficjalne konto pocztowe europejskich internautow! 
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f19e8