[blml] By the pricking of my thumbs [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Grattan Endicott:

[snip]

>    We have to consider our position with
>regard to the possibility of a purposeful
>action, of whatever kind, to alert partner
>to his irregularity (Law 73A1).
>                         ~ Grattan ~   +=+

Richard Hills:

Except that it seems to me that a Law 25A
inadvertent call is not an irregularity.

Law 25A specifies "without penalty" when an
originally intended legal call replaces an
unintended (inadvertent) call.

It seems to me that if a Law 25A inadvertent
call is null and void, it matters not if the
null and void call was notionally an illegal
insufficient bid, so therefore Law 73A1 is
not applicable to Law 25A.


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch, DIAC
02 6225 6285

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm