[blml] By the pricking of my thumbs [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Tim West-Meads
> Richard postulated
> 
> > Except that it seems to me that a Law 25A
> > inadvertent call is not an irregularity.
> 
> L18d: A bid that fails to supersede the immediately previous bid is an
> insufficient bid.
> 
> No exceptions there for inadvertency.
> 
> Tim

A call that has been accepted under Law 25A as an inadvertent call is
considered null and void. Consequently it has never been made, conveyed no
information and was no more an irregularity than for instance a casual cough
or sneeze would be.

Sven