[blml] Honolulu NABC+ Case 1

[Adam Beneschan]

> Subject: Re: [blml] Honolulu NABC+ Case 1
> 
> 
> > > From case 1:  "The table director's decision of an
> adjustment to 3NT
> > > making four, N/S plus 630 was upheld."
> > >
> > > Perhaps you mean a different case?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake, Marvin said NABC+ case 1, which is the
> fourth case listed.
> >
> Marvin got the subject line wrong, it was "non-NABC+" case
> No. 1

Now I'm totally confused.  Your original post said "Yet another
example of an AC overturning an easy and correct TD ruling"---but in
non-NABC+ case 1, the AC upheld the director's ruling, and in NABC+
case 1, they overruled the TD.

In fact, non-NABC+ case 1 doesn't appear to be controversial at all.

So may we assume that you got it right the first time, and that your
attempt to correct your "error" was the mistake?

                                -- Adam