[blml] Two questions on incorrect TD rulings

[Peter Eidt]

David Grabiner asked:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > When a TD gives a ruling which could be proved to be incorrect from
> > the Law book, and you are dummy and have not been asked by the TD to
> > say anything, what are you supposed to do?  Wait until the end of
> > the hand and then call the TD back and ask for a L82C ruling (which
> > could be more favorable to your side than an immediate correct
> > ruling)?
> > 

Richard Hills answered by citing the law: 
> Law 43A1(b):
> 
> "Dummy may not call attention to an irregularity during play."
> 

Peter Eidt found:
Minutes of the Meeting of the WBF LC, Paris, 30.10.2001:

"5. The committee agreed that references to irregularities
in the laws refer to irregularities committed by players. An
action by a Director may be an error but this does not
constitute an ‘irregularity’ within the meaning of the laws."

Therefore I think, that dummy may point to a
TD's error while applying the law.