[blml] Two questions on incorrect TD rulings [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The best words in the best order"
                          ~ S T Coleridge.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <richard.hills at immi.gov.au>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Two questions on incorrect TD 
                            rulings [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> David Grabiner asked:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >When a TD gives a ruling which could be proved to be 
>> incorrect from the Law book, and you are dummy and 
> >have not been asked by the TD to say anything, what 
> >are you supposed to do?  Wait until the end of the hand
> >and then call the TD back and ask for a L82C ruling 
> > (which could be more favorable to your side than an 
> >immediate correct ruling)?
> 
> Law 43A1(b):
> 
> "Dummy may not call attention to an irregularity during play."
> 
+=+  "The committee agreed that references to irregularities 
in the laws refer to irregularities committed by players. An 
action by a Director may be an error but this does not 
constitute an 'irregularity' within the meaning of the laws,"
                      WBFLC minute, 30th October, 2001.

Inter alia the word appears in Law 9.  But was the question 
not about Law 42A1? 
                                          ~ Grattan ~   +=+