[blml] Are the laws clear on telling pard to ask a question?
Steve Willner
willner at cfa.harvard.edu
Wed Mar 21 03:28:57 CET 2007
> From: "Jerry Fusselman" <jfusselman at gmail.com>
> I was declarer as South, and while West was considering her lead, East
> said, "Wait! What did your (my) 2S bid show?" 2S was alerted, but no
> one asked during the auction.
I'm coming late to this question, but I don't think anyone has given a
full answer. Some of the answers that have been given seem bizarre.
The first issue is what East's question really means. If it means
something like "I have a good holding in spades, and I'd like you to
lead one," that's ordinary UI to West. (As a matter of terminology,
this is an "informatory question.") We all know how to deal with that
via L16A, etc.
The more interesting meaning is something like "That 2S bid was not what
you think, and you really ought to ask about it." This is not a UI
problem; it's an infraction of L73B1, a wholly different matter. (This
is termed a "pro question.") If this infraction causes damage, the
Director should go to L12A1 and 12C2 (and possibly 12C3 if it is in
force). In practice, there are two cases: if West leads without asking
about 2S, L73B1 damage is very unlikely. If West _does_ ask, the
Director needs to consider what would have happened if the irregularity
-- East's question -- had not occurred. In practice, if the lead worked
out well for EW, and there was any likelihood that West would not have
asked, and the answer to the 2S question could have suggested the lead,
the Director should adjust the score. Of course the Director should
explain all this before West asks about 2S, and a sensible West then
won't ask because it can't be to his advantage.
The Director will get this right if he realizes two things: East's
question, because of its timing, was illegal, and UI only applies to
unseen cards, not to opponents' methods.
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
> I would as TD have denied West the right to ask any question after East's
> illegal activity
This is going too far, though proper advice (L10C1) to a sensible West
will have the same effect. It probably would be simpler to rule as Sven
wishes, but the current Laws don't support doing so.
More information about the blml
mailing list