[blml] the De Wael Question [SEC=PERSONAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The best words in the best order"
                          ~ S T Coleridge.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herman De Wael" <hermandw at skynet.be>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] the De Wael Question [SEC=PERSONAL]


> richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:
> > Given that Grattan has finally given a reasonably
> > authoritative refutation of the De Wael School on
> > this thread, I see no point in endlessly traversing
> > old ground publicly on blml until the new Lawbook is
> > available to everyone (circa October / November).
> > 
> > By the way, when the new Lawbook is released, you
> > may be intrigued to discover that (as Grattan has
> > previously hinted on blml) your blml postings on
> > claims have caused the claim Laws to be tightened
> > and clarified.
> > 
> 
> I have also read the pre-release and I am happy to 
> say that there are no changes which will force a 
> different ruling in any case that I  remember (even 
> including the Maastricht claim).
> 
+=+ The next code of laws is still in its formative stages 
and until it is settled and adopted, we hope in Shanghai,
I cannot discuss it here. If Richard and/or Herman is 
among those we have consulted upon any matter the
confidentiality in that remains.
                         ~ Grattan ~   +=+