[blml] Réf._:_Re:__the_De_Wael_Question__[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The best words in the best order"
                          ~ S T Coleridge.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "raija" <mustikka at charter.net>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 6:43 PM

> 
> HDW expects the lawbook to say it is forbidden 
> to *lie to the opponents about one's agreements*?  
> Or have I managed to completely misunderstand 
> what was said?  Telling lies is considered unethical 
> in any culture I am aware of; IMO there need be 
> no law and no lawbook to outlaw lying.
> 
> Raija
> 
+=+ It should be understood, Raija, that Herman 
postulates argument and debates it in the manner of 
sophists who are prepared to enter into debate on a 
subject however specious. He knows, as you and I 
know, that it is unlawful to misinform opponents as 
to the partnership's *agreements* and that Laws 
72B2 and 90A would apply to any purposeful 
disregard of the law.    
                             ~ Grattan ~   +=+