[blml] why no convention card?

[Robert Geller]

Could someone please explain why this whole scenario couldn't
be resoved by showing the opponents your convention card, which
presumably lists the correct agreement?   You can't look at it, but
they can.

-Bob

Alain Gottcheiner さんは書きました:
> 
>
> 
>
>-------Message original-------
>
> 
>
>De : Herman De Wael
>
>And I do admit that maybe there is only one director who disagrees
>
>here (although I would like to see some support from those that
>
>silently agree with me) but I am still asking to be shown in the
>
>Lawbook where it says that I, Herman the player, must reveal to my
>
>opponents that I am only 85% certain of what our agreements actually are.
>
> 
>
>AG : And I'd like to know what the Laws have to say about the right way to 
establish the exact percentage of confidence. If I give the wrong %age, am I liable 
to penalty ? And how will it be ascertained ?
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>_______________________________________________
>blml mailing list
>blml at amsterdamned.org
>http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com