[blml] why no convention card?
Robert Geller
geller at nifty.com
Mon Mar 26 16:12:49 CEST 2007
I don't know the rules in your country, but here in Japan each pair is
required to have two identically, completely filled out, convention cards
if they want to play anything more than a standard meat-and-potatoes
system. If they were playing 1430 and didn't have two identical
filled-out convention cards they would already be in violation of this
rule and subject to penalty....
So I hope you will forgive me for suggesting that the premise of this
discussion is unrealistic. Of course it might be the case in your country
that the regulations don't require convention cards to be filled out.
If this is the case may I suggest that this rule be adopted and enforced.
Cheers,
Bob
Alain Gottcheiner さんは書きました:
>
>
>
>
>-------Message original-------
>
>
>
>De : Robert Geller
>
>Date : 26/03/2007 15:16:00
>
>A : Alain Gottcheiner
>
>Cc : blml; Herman De Wael
>
>Sujet : why no convention card?
>
>
>
>Could someone please explain why this whole scenario couldn't
>
>be resolved by showing the opponents your convention card, which
>
>presumably lists the correct agreement? You can't look at it, but
>
>they can.
>
>
>
>Sure it could, in many cases . But the fact that you don't know means the
>sequence will often be of the less-standard type, which means it might not
>be written.
>
>Anyway, this mannerism hints to your not knowing, and that's UI according to
>some.
>
>
>
>But it seems that, even when a bid"s meaning is on your CC, you have to
>answer questions correctly. Many AC rulings have mentioned that.
>
>
>
>Best regards
>
>
>
> Alain
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller, Tokyo, Japan geller at nifty.com
More information about the blml
mailing list