[blml] Be prepared! [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Thu May 10 10:03:46 CEST 2007
At 09:03 10/05/2007 +1000, richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:
>Richard Hills:
>
>I am not in South's class of player, because I
>did not agree with South's 3S overcall.
AG : the word "class", in TFLB, doesn't mean "school of thought" ; but
rather "level", as is apparent in the footnote of L70.
>Therefore, my views on the logic of captaincy
>in this auction do not mean that the logical
>call of pass is a so-called "logical"
>alternative for South. Given the WBF CoP
>definition, "logical" is a misnomer.
AG : granted. What would logical alternatives be aftetr a sequence where
former bids were ridiculous ? Remain ridicule ?
NB : I would unquestionably have bid 6S on KQ3 KJT8742 85 A (with some
partners, 5H would be FNJ). My partners' overcalls are quite sound unless
short in their suit.
More generally, I'd like to see something written to the point that, after
making a NF bid and receiving lowest-level support, pass is always a LA.
Best regards
Alain
Best regards
Alain
More information about the blml
mailing list