[blml] uninteresting question - HELP!

[Andre Kriner]

Hi all!

>The almost unanimous opinion on the dutch forum was that as there is a new
>current trick, West must contribute the card that his partner could have
>seen, thereby establishing the revoke. To me this seems most practical,
>because IMHO Law 45C in the mind of most TDs will mean that a card of a
>defender that could have been seen by his partner IS played, not MUST BE
>played.

Today I posed that question to one of the leading German TDs and he
argued, that the revoke is indeed established.

Greetings,

Andre