[blml] Réf. : Re: Confused - second lead out of turn
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at pop.ulb.ac.be
Thu May 31 14:26:39 CEST 2007
-------Message original-------
The director may feel obliged to fine north. (10% or 3 imps?) (laws 90/91)
Agree, but I remember a case where the director said "you may disallow the
lead, and in that case you have the following options etc." but failed to
say that in that case the lead reverted to the "real" LHO.
Declarer decided to prohibit the lead, and RHO in all good faith led another
suit
Best regards
Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070531/8cd44e64/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070531/8cd44e64/attachment-0001.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2435 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070531/8cd44e64/attachment-0002.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070531/8cd44e64/attachment-0003.gif
More information about the blml
mailing list