[blml] An EBU L&E decision.
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Thu Nov 1 09:38:56 CET 2007
In a message dated 01/11/2007 02:52:19 GMT Standard Time,
ereppert at rochester.rr.com writes:
>One purpose of an AC is to provide a check on a TDs bridge judgement.
>Your interpretation of Law 90B8 would negate that purpose. Therefore
>I reject your interpretation. If a TD told me, as an AC member, to
>ignore that purpose, I would resign from the committee rather than
>follow that instruction. And I would report the incident to the
>appropriate authority (which, I grant you, might not mean much).
Shucks. I thought I was on safe ground when directing our Christmas Social
each year when deciding that on one board play will be anticlockwise and on
another North will be a member of the silent Eustacian order like Brother
Anthony. Not to mention the other rules I brought in on the other 14 boards we
play. E.Reppert seems to think I cannot make any decisions on the Laws of Bridge
I like and these can be overturned by an AC.
More information about the blml
mailing list