[blml] An EBU L&E decision.

Gampas at aol.com Gampas at aol.com
Thu Nov 1 09:38:56 CET 2007


In a message dated 01/11/2007 02:52:19 GMT Standard Time,  
ereppert at rochester.rr.com writes:

>One purpose of an AC is to provide a check on a TDs bridge  judgement.  
>Your interpretation of Law 90B8 would negate that  purpose. Therefore  
>I reject your interpretation. If a TD told me,  as an AC member, to  
>ignore that purpose, I would resign from the  committee rather than  
>follow that instruction. And I would report  the incident to the  
>appropriate authority (which, I grant you,  might not mean much).
 
Shucks. I thought I was on safe ground when directing our Christmas Social  
each year when deciding that on one board play will be anticlockwise and on  
another North will be a member of the silent Eustacian order like Brother  
Anthony. Not to mention the other rules I brought in on the other 14 boards we  
play. E.Reppert seems to think I cannot make any decisions on the Laws of Bridge  
I like and these can be overturned by an AC.
 
 



   



More information about the blml mailing list