[blml] Disclosure f2f

[Guthrie]

[John Probst ... from the "On-line law reform" thread]
...my experience of WBF alerting is that it's way better than EBU or
alerting.

[Stefanie Rohan]
Makes one wonder why we feel the need to reinvent the wheel by 
producing page upon page of complex alerting regulations in the Orange 
Book.  WBF permitted agreements lists could be used too.  These would 
have to be modified to fit what we want at our levels of competition, 
but it would be a matter of moving round paragraphs and sections 
rather than doing the whole thing from scratch.

[Nige1]
John and Stephanie are right :) And Herman seems to be suggesting much 
the same :) This is progress. A large step in the right direction...

[A] If the WBF Coc were part of the law book as *default* law, then...

(i) Conformance would save local jurisdictions a lot of work :)

(ii) If a parochial local jurisdiction tried to impose a chauvinistic 
variant, then local players might realise what they were missing and 
vocalise their dissent

A few more small steps and we're nearly there.

[B] Define a simple coherent playable subset of agreements as a 
*standard system*

[C] When playing without screens, alert -- or better announce -- 
departures therefrom.