[blml] A day late and a dollar short
Ed Reppert
ereppert at rochester.rr.com
Sat Nov 3 15:31:52 CET 2007
While I was responding to a thread on the BBO forums about Law 16, it
occurred to me that Law 16A1 might have been better if worded "When a
player considers that an opponent has made such information available
and that damage could well result, he should obtain agreement from
the opponents as to the facts, summoning the Director immediately if
the opponents dispute the fact that unauthorized information might
have been conveyed." This has the same practical effect as the
current law (substantially unchanged in the new laws), at least in
the ACBL, except it places the onus to call the director on the
player who asserts there was UI rather than on the opponents who
don't agree. I don't see a problem with it, but it was my idea, so
maybe I'm blinded by my own brilliance :)). Anyway, what does the
list think?
More information about the blml
mailing list