[blml] Dealer or no dealer

[John Probst]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Grabiner" <grabiner at alumni.princeton.edu>
To: "Bridge Laws Discussion List" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:38 AM
Subject: [blml] Dealer or no dealer


> Some sets of duplicate boards have stickers next to the pockets, 
> identifying the
> dealer and vulnerability.  The absence of a sticker indicates that the 
> player is
> not the dealer and is not vulnerable.  On one such board 4, the sticker 
> for West
> as Dealer-VUL is missing, so there is no dealer marked.  The second time 
> the
> board is played (so a redeal or replacement board is not possible), South 
> opens
> out of turn.  Do you enforce a penalty for an opening bid out of turn?

I rule fouled board :)  john
>
> L2 doesn't help here; it says that the board must be played as marked, 
> which
> would imply that it must be played with no dealer, and with East 
> vulnerable but
> West not vulnerable.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml