[blml] Wrong direction

[Steve Willner]

> From: Torsten Ã…strand <torsten.astrand at telia.com>
> In Sweden is North responsible for the boards. I.e. placed and played 
> correctly.

You still haven't made it clear exactly what happened.  I gather:
1. EW at Table 1 got a horrible result.
2. Teammate N at Table 2 rotated the board.  Was it rotated 90 degrees 
or 180?  If the latter, why not let the board be played?

If the rotation was 90 degrees, the normal thing would be to give NS at 
table 2 avg-, EW avg+, and disregard the result at Table 1.  (In most 
jurisdictions, the NS and EW pairs are equally responsible for the 
correct board position, so the board would either be replaced with a 
substitute or scored avg for both sides.)  However, if and only if there 
is some way T2 N "could have known" about the EW result at the other 
table, you use L72B1 and give an _assigned_ adjusted score at T2.