[blml] About restoring equity

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Guthrie a écrit :
>
> Konrad is right that the ruling does not appear to be "equitable" in 
> the discredited law-book sense.  Much more importantly, however, from 
> a player's view-point: it is objective, consistent and understandable.
>
>
>   
The technical word is "intersubjective", i.e. anyone given the case, the 
set of laws and reasoninng capabilities should come to the same ruling.

There is, however, that last problem : most "second revoke" cases can 
lead to invoking L72B1, to such a point that the "no penalty" in L64B2 
is almost void if one is to take L72B1 literally. And, precisely, L72B1 
is among the most subjective and least intersubjective.

Best regards

   Alain