[blml] About restoring equity

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of David Burn
> [SP]
> 
> Sorry, I do not accept this as a reasonably sane auction
> 
> [DALB]
> 
> And I do not accept this as a reasonably (or at all) sane reply to
> Konrad's
> post. He made it completely clear that he had invented a hand to
> illustrate
> what he saw as a problem in the Laws. This is the Bridge Laws Mailing
> List,
> not the Why You Should Not Be In 1NT Mailing List, so quibbles about an
> auction that never existed in any case are truly absurd.

Exactly, and as I said in my first comment I shall give NS exactly 1NT made,
nothing more, nothing less.

Any discussion for equity must take into consideration all circumstances,
including the auction and the play demonstrated. And both the contract and
opponents' play puzzled me.

Regards Sven