[blml] About restoring equity

[Ed Reppert]

On Nov 7, 2007, at 6:24 AM, PeterEidt at t-online.de wrote:

> The second revoke leads to no trick penalty (Law 64 B2).
> But here the revoke destroys the communication between
> hand and dummy and results in damage for the non-offending
> side. Therefore Law 64 C is applied for the scond revoke
> (all black tricks that remain after cashing the reds, max. 7)

Hm. We are down to whether "had no irregularity occurred" in the laws  
means literally what it says, or refers only to the irregularity in  
immediate question (in this case, the second revoke). I'm not sure,  
but I think the WBFLC has said the former.