[blml] About restoring equity

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Sven Pran a écrit :
>> On Behalf Of David Burn
>> [SP]
>>
>> Sorry, I do not accept this as a reasonably sane auction
>>
>> [DALB]
>>
>> And I do not accept this as a reasonably (or at all) sane reply to
>> Konrad's
>> post. He made it completely clear that he had invented a hand to
>> illustrate
>> what he saw as a problem in the Laws. This is the Bridge Laws Mailing
>> List,
>> not the Why You Should Not Be In 1NT Mailing List, so quibbles about an
>> auction that never existed in any case are truly absurd.
>>     
>
> Exactly, and as I said in my first comment I shall give NS exactly 1NT made,
> nothing more, nothing less.
>
> Any discussion for equity must take into consideration all circumstances,
> including the auction and the play demonstrated. 

IBTD. "Restoring equity", as has been said before, means "restoring the 
result that was probable, /at the moment of the infraction/, if the 
infraction didn't happen".
Whence, in revoke (or LOOT) cases, the bidding is irrelevant.

Best regards

   Alain