[blml] About restoring equity

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Grattan Endicott a écrit :
>
> +=+ Could you point me to the place, please, where these words 
> appear? In Law 12C2 I read: "had the irregularity not occurred" 
> and in 72B1 "through the irregularity". It should be added that 
> 64C refers to "any established revoke, including those not subject 
> to penalty". Law 64B2 lists a second revoke by the same offender 
> in the same suit.  
>   

So, to summarize, the second revoke doesn't incur any systematic 
penalty, but is still subject to equity-oriented corrections. Right ?

In which case, in contradiction with the Antalya case, the two revokes 
could be treated separately. Or is there one more subtlety ?

Best regards

  Alain