[blml] Disclosure f2f
Stefanie Rohan
daisy_duck at btopenworld.com
Fri Nov 9 02:27:16 CET 2007
raija <mustikka at charter.net> wrote:
Brian wrote:
As I said, too many players come from F2F bridge to the online
game with the idea that their local NBO's regulations and common
systems are the world-wide standard, and disabusing them of that notion
can be a right nuisance. There *is* a cost to devolving down to the
national level, even if players who only play F2F in their own country
don't see it.
[Stefanie wrote]
I think that the latter players are those whom the regulations are supposed
to serve. I don't think that many people in the world of bridge are that
concerned with the trials and tribulations of online players, and quite
right.
Online bridge is much more populous than you seem to think.
Cheers,
Raija
I have not suggested that nobody plays it. I play myself, from time to time. I am just saying that it would be a mistake for the WBF and NBOs to devise their disclosure regulations to cater for online play. And possibly there won't be a problem too far into the future; I can envision the day that every bid comes with an automated explanation.
Cheers
Stefanie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20071109/833b971f/attachment.htm
More information about the blml
mailing list