[blml] Disclosure f2f

Stefanie Rohan daisy_duck at btopenworld.com
Fri Nov 9 02:27:16 CET 2007



raija <mustikka at charter.net> wrote: 
Brian  wrote:
As I said, too many players come from F2F bridge to the online
game with the idea that their local NBO's regulations and common
systems are the world-wide standard, and disabusing them of that notion
can be a right nuisance. There *is* a cost to devolving down to the
national level, even if players who only play F2F in their own country
don't see it.



[Stefanie wrote]
I think that the latter players are those whom the regulations are supposed 
to serve.  I don't think that many people in the world of bridge are that 
concerned with the trials and tribulations of online players, and quite 
right.



Online bridge is much more populous than you seem to think.

Cheers,
Raija 

I have not suggested that nobody plays it.  I play myself, from time to time.  I am just saying that it would be a mistake for the WBF and NBOs to devise their disclosure regulations to cater for online play.  And possibly there won't be a problem too far into the future; I can envision the day that every bid comes with an automated explanation.

Cheers

Stefanie


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20071109/833b971f/attachment.htm 


More information about the blml mailing list