[blml] Disclosure f2f
Eric Landau
ehaa at starpower.net
Fri Nov 9 17:52:49 CET 2007
On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:24:43 +0900
> Robert Geller <geller at nifty.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree completely with Stefanie that local regulations are fine,
>> rather than arbitrarily creating a "one size fits all" global
>> standard system.
>
> Well, I'll tell you that it's an absolute pain in the backside as far
> as online bridge is concerned, where any number of newcomers to the
> online game who have played bridge under their local NBO think that
> it's
> *their* local regulations that are in force world wide.
They think their local regulations are in force on-line because they
think their local regulations make more sense than any others.
They think their local regulations make more sense than any others
because they are used to playing face to face at their local venues,
where (in this context) they are presumably correct.
Good regulations reflect a consensus as to how the game should be
played; they do not futilely attempt to arbitrarily enforce one.
Disclosure regulations based on a global standard system would work
very well indeed. Too bad we don't have a global standard system on
which to base them. What some in this forum don't understand is that
picking some system arbitrarily and calling it "the global standard
system" won't make it so.
Eric Landau
1107 Dale Drive
Silver Spring MD 20910
ehaa at starpower.net
More information about the blml
mailing list