[blml] Disclosure f2f
richard willey
richard.willey at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 14:39:15 CET 2007
Out of curiousity, Nigel, do you have any actual experience playing
online bridge? if so, which service are you using and how long have
you been playing? (I'm trying to figure out if you have any real
basis for your theories or are "just" engaged in idle speculation).
Case in point: Right now, most online players claim to be familar
with some SAYC type system. In actuality, none of them have the
slightest clue what they are doing because there is no consensus
regarding what SAYC actually is.
Standard American Yellow Card started out as a fairly well defined
system (It was a crappy system, but it was quite well defined). Over
the course of a couple years, SAYC fragmented into a 1001 different
approaches as everyone and their brother started trying to "improve"
things while making no effort what-so-ever to preserve a clear
nomenclature. Now-a-days no one has a clue whether or not their
partner shares the same understand of every day sequences like the
following
1S - 2N: Is this a forcing Spade raise?
1S - 2C - 2N: Is this forcing?
1C - 1H - 1S: Does this promise an unbalanced hand?
How do you make a forcing raise of partner's minor?
There is no evidence that the system is stabling. Indeed, I'd argue
that it continues to splinter. Yeats said it best:
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
More information about the blml
mailing list