[blml] AI or UI
David Grabiner
grabiner at alumni.princeton.edu
Tue Nov 20 04:02:49 CET 2007
Gampas at aol.com writes:
> This reminds me of a somewhat different one, where my partner led a club out
> of turn. The declarer, having been read his options, chose that I led a
> club, but I was void. I therefore led another suit, and the director seemed
> uncertain whether the fact that I had a club void was now UI to my partner,
> as
> that information was not gleaned from the "withdrawn action" but was gleaned
> from the failure to comply with the penalty, but I think that it was
> "arising"
> from the "withdrawn action" so is UI.
I would say that the club void is AI, because it arises from other actions which
are AI. The fact that you were penalized, and the penalty, are AI. You
complied with the penalty by showing out of clubs.
The same principle applies with many other penalties. If partner drops the HQ
on the table and must lead it as a penalty card, it is AI to you that the HQ
play was forced, and thus you need not assume that he has the HJ, nor that he
believes that a heart was the best lead. (However, if he had led the HQ out of
turn, the fact that he wanted to lead a heart arose from his withdrawn action,
and that is UI to you.)
Your specific case was an explicit example in the 1975 Law book, but it was gone
in the 1987 book. The example was the distinction between direct and indirect
damage.
Direct damage: East has Jxx of clubs, and North has AKQxxx and no side entries.
East revokes on the third club trick and wins the fourth. Declarer goes down
three but would have made his contract without the revoke. The penalty for the
revoke should be three tricks, not the usual two.
Indirect damage: East commits an irregularity during the auction, allowing South
to require or forbid a diamond lead. South requires a diamond lead. West has
no diamonds and leads something else, and East later gives West a diamond ruff
which would not have been a normal play otherwise. The damage was not a direct
consequence of the infraction, and the score should be allowed to stand.
More information about the blml
mailing list